April 10, 2007
ASA weekly: USDA prospective plantings analysis; Nebraska strikes soy deal with Cuba; Research on extracting ethanol from soymeal; Barge freight rates slump
USDA prospective plantings analysis
USDA issued its 2007 Prospective Plantings report on Mar 30 showing a total crop planted area of 127 million hectares, 1.86 million hectares above last year and, if realised, would be the largest planted area since 2004.
Soybean area is expected to total 27.2 million hectares, which would be 1.29 million hectares below last year and about 809,000 hectares below what the market expected USDA to report. This will be the lowest soybean planted area since 26 million hectares was planted in 1996. In percentage terms, the largest cuts were in North Dakota, Kansas, Louisiana and Texas. USDA reported increased plantings in New York, the Carolinas, Georgia, Florida, and Alabama.
USDA shocked the market with a corn plantings intention figure of 36.6 million hectares, up 4.9 million hectares from last year. This was a bigger shift in planting area than the market was anticipating.
Despite many analysts' view that the Prospective Plantings report showed farmers' incentive to shift to corn from soybeans (as well as cotton, spring wheat and rice), there is evidence that corn increases do not have to come completely at the expense of soybeans. In fact, this idea may have contributed to the sharp drop in soybean futures following USDA's report.
Market reaction may also reflect the response that might occur elsewhere in the world. Critical for the soybean market will be how aggressively Brazil expands its soybean production, which may be moderated by its strengthening currency. The response in Argentina probably will not be more soybean hectares, but instead, that country is likely to react more like the US since it is well positioned to increase corn production and exports.
Nebraska strikes soybean deal with Cuba
Nebraskan farmers appear to be on the verge of a deal that would annually send US$55 million in soybeans directly to Cuba, according to a report in the Omaha World Herald. The arrangement, if finalised in the coming months, would bypass normal channels for grain shipments as a way of providing better-quality soybeans to Cuba.
A sale of this size would bolster soybean prices in the state and would also consume about 3 percent of Nebraska's soybean crop at a time when there is about a year's supply in storage.
The Nebraska Agriculture Department and the Nebraska Soybean Board are negotiating with the Cuban import authority. The soybean contract, if finalised, would be the largest Nebraska-Cuba trade agreement yet.
Wisconsin company working on extracting ethanol from soymeal
The soymeal market may soon exhibit the same reaction to ethanol demand if a company's research proves commercially viable. According to a report from The Public Ledger, C5-6 Technologies, which is based in Wisconsin, is researching enzymes that will extract ethanol from soymeal. Up to this point, only biodiesel has been made from soybeans via its oil.
"We could have a process that is by far the most profitable ethanol process out there," claimed John Biondi, president of C5-6 Technologies. He noted that the process also creates a soy protein concentrate that can be used as a petroleum substitute in products such as adhesives and plastics.
"This could dramatically increase ethanol production without requiring new acres of corn to be planted," said Brett Hulsey, president of Better Environmental Solutions, who has been hired as a consultant. "It's good to have crop diversity."
Expanding beyond corn for ethanol production in the United States is a strategy that Biondi said is necessary for the industry to be sustainable. "We have to have multiple feedstocks in order to get to the level of bio-fuels production that we're going to need in order to make a significant difference in oil consumption," he said. "We can't do it on corn alone."
Barge freight rates slump
The cost to move grain by barge off the Illinois River ended March down 22 percent from one year ago to 274 percent of tariff, a monthly average last seen in July 2005. March is a precarious month for barge freight as navigation conditions can vary from one week to another let alone one month to the next.
During March, the Upper Mississippi River reopens to navigation after being closed for the winter. And in some years, the spring thaw leads to spring flooding that impacts navigation. Given such an environment, barge volumes can and do vary considerably as well.
Barge freight rates are on the backside of a strong freight period that started in July 2004 and punctuated with impacts from hurricanes Katrina and Rita. This market is poised for considerable upside potential. Scrap steel prices have reportedly jumped in recent weeks and could signal an opportunity for a step up in barge scrapping, especially in light of the soft freight rates.
Freight rates have been under pressure for slower movements of commodities including steel, cement and grain to a certain degree. Steel imports for February were reported down 27 percent from last year to 2.4 million tonnes. More than one-third of all imported steel enters the US through the Gulf, with a considerable volume moved by barge upriver. This is well reflected in movement weakness through the key locks on the upper river segments.
Oilseed and grain barge volumes turned higher soon after the ice started melting, but have since fallen to near 15 year lows on a weekly basis. While the barge market is going through a bit of a slump, it still has momentum with decent commodity movements still built into the fundamentals.
US & South America Soybean/Products Balance
|
United States |
|
| |||||||
|
|
Actual |
Estimate |
Proj. |
Actual |
Estimate |
Proj. |
Actual |
Estimate |
Proj. |
|
|
2004/05 |
2005/06 |
2006/07 |
2004/05 |
2005/06 |
2006/07 |
2004/05 |
2005/06 |
2006/07 |
|
Soybeans |
thousand tonnes | ||||||||
|
Carryin |
3,059 |
6,960 |
12,229 |
2,434 |
514 |
579 |
3,400 |
1,440 |
514 |
|
Production |
85,013 |
83,368 |
86,770 |
39,000 |
40,500 |
44,000 |
53,000 |
55,000 |
56,000 |
|
Imports |
152 |
92 |
109 |
708 |
900 |
950 |
353 |
60 |
100 |
|
Crush |
46,160 |
47,320 |
48,444 |
29,560 |
32,600 |
36,000 |
29,730 |
28,200 |
27,300 |
|
Exports |
30,011 |
25,778 |
29,937 |
10,548 |
7,200 |
7,350 |
22,798 |
25,450 |
26,700 |
|
Other |
5,093 |
5,093 |
4,521 |
1,520 |
1,535 |
1,566 |
2,785 |
2,336 |
2,024 |
|
Usage |
81,264 |
78,191 |
82,902 |
41,628 |
41,335 |
44,916 |
55,313 |
55,986 |
56,024 |
|
Carryout |
6,960 |
12,229 |
16,206 |
514 |
579 |
613 |
1,440 |
514 |
590 |
|
Soymeal |
thousand tonnes | ||||||||
|
Carryin |
191 |
156 |
285 |
1,350 |
1,187 |
1,549 |
870 |
640 |
490 |
|
Production |
36,936 |
37,414 |
38,484 |
23,347 |
25,487 |
28,400 |
22,928 |
21,850 |
21,435 |
|
Domestic use |
30,446 |
30,097 |
30,754 |
537 |
575 |
650 |
9,162 |
9,950 |
10,200 |
|
Net Exports |
6,525 |
7,188 |
7,743 |
22,973 |
24,550 |
27,600 |
13,996 |
12,050 |
11,400 |
|
Usage |
36,971 |
37,285 |
38,497 |
23,510 |
25,125 |
28,250 |
23,158 |
22,000 |
21,600 |
|
Carryout |
156 |
285 |
272 |
1,187 |
1,549 |
1,699 |
640 |
490 |
325 |
|
Soybean oil |
thousand tonnes | ||||||||
|
Carryin |
488 |
771 |
1,370 |
660 |
542 |
659 |
293 |
248 |
450 |
|
Production |
8,781 |
9,250 |
9,147 |
5,404 |
6,200 |
6,800 |
5,708 |
5,403 |
5,233 |
|
Domestic use |
7,910 |
8,144 |
8,641 |
408 |
458 |
709 |
3,059 |
3,319 |
3,385 |
|
Net exports |
588 |
507 |
656 |
5,114 |
5,625 |
6,100 |
2,694 |
1,882 |
2,000 |
|
Usage |
8,498 |
8,651 |
9,297 |
5,522 |
6,083 |
6,809 |
5,753 |
5,201 |
5,385 |
|
Carryout |
771 |
1,370 |
1,220 |
542 |
659 |
650 |
248 |
450 |
298 |
USDA Export Sales (tmt) - Week of 29 March 2007
|
New |
Accum. |
|
|
|
New |
Accum. | ||
|
Country |
Commodity |
Sales |
Exports |
|
Country |
Commodity |
Sales |
Exports |
|
|
Soybeans |
20.7 |
9882.2 |
|
|
Soymeal |
1.7 |
64.9 |
|
|
Soybeans |
5.7 |
183.5 |
|
|
Soymeal |
1.5 |
28.4 |
|
|
Soybeans |
43.9 |
824.9 |
|
|
Soymeal |
2.2 |
54.2 |
|
|
Soybeans |
190.3 |
1901.8 |
|
|
Soymeal |
1.3 |
180.3 |
|
Korea, Rep. |
Soybeans |
1.6 |
496.6 |
|
|
Soymeal |
22.2 |
692 |
|
|
Soybeans |
24.3 |
186.4 |
|
|
Soymeal |
12 |
18 |
|
|
Soybeans |
43.2 |
2208.2 |
|
|
Soymeal |
5.1 |
34.3 |
|
|
Soybeans |
135.1 |
1390.5 |
|
|
Soymeal |
31.9 |
218.8 |
|
|
Soybeans |
0.7 |
51 |
|
|
Soymeal |
3.6 |
66 |
|
|
Soybeans |
39.5 |
222.4 |
|
|
Soyoil |
3.7 |
18.3 |
|
|
Soybeans |
13.1 |
1244.2 |
|
|
Soyoil |
0.2 |
0.4 |
|
|
Soymeal |
43 |
43 |
|
|
Soyoil |
1.7 |
43.6 |
|
|
Soymeal |
11.5 |
641.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soymeal |
7.2 |
163.1 |
|
Export Sales Totals (tmt) | |||
|
|
Soymeal |
40.1 |
46.4 |
|
Commodity |
Outstanding |
Accum. |
New |
|
Dom. Rep. |
Soymeal |
3.9 |
211.4 |
|
Sales |
Exports |
Sales | |
|
|
Soymeal |
22 |
28.9 |
|
Soybeans |
3,789.40 |
23,375.50 |
259.3 |
|
FWW IND |
Soymeal |
2.9 |
8.6 |
|
Soymeal |
1,630.60 |
3,497.80 |
121.6 |
|
|
Soymeal |
10.8 |
173.5 |
|
Soyoil |
45.3 |
331.3 |
13.8 |










