Nutritional quality assessment of commonly used oilseed meals in poultry feed

Friday, May 22, 2020


Nutritional quality assessment of commonly used oilseed meals in poultry feed
 

M. Ali, P. Ramesh, S. Ramos and P. Krishnan, Nutrition & Care, Animal Nutrition, Evonik (SEA) Pte Ltd, Singapore
 

 

The current focus of poultry feed industry is to minimize the variation in feed quality, maximize feed efficiency and reduce feed cost. Feed quality mainly depends on the quality of raw materials and major factors contributing to variation in quality of raw materials include crop varieties, climatic conditions, fertilization practices, soil fertility, processing techniques, storage conditions and presence of anti-nutritional substances. Therefore, there is need to continuously assess the nutritional quality of raw materials using reliable analytical methods/services. Wet-chemistry is the most accurate method for assessing the nutritive value of raw materials, but it is very expensive and time consuming. Therefore, Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIR) is considered as the most practical approach for quality testing in the poultry feed industry. Over 195,000 samples of soybean meal (SBM), soy full fat (SFF) and rapeseed meal (RSM) from Asia South were analyzed in 2017-19 for amino acids (AA) composition, proximate parameters and apparent metabolizable energy corrected for nitrogen (AMEn) using Evonik AMINONIR® services (Figure 1).
 


Figure 1:  Number of soybean meal, full fat soy and rapeseed meal samples analyzed using Evonik AMINONIR® services (2017-19) in Asia South

 

Soybean meal


It is a by-product of whole soybean seeds after oil extraction. It is the most preferred protein source for poultry and livestock feed due to high content of digestible AA. A poultry diet based on corn and SBM provides a good balance of all essential AA except methionine (Waldroup et al., 2008). It is usually classified and sold in poultry and livestock feed market on its crude protein (CP) content. It is classified into two main categories; high-protein (47-49% CP), obtained from dehulled seeds, and the conventional (44-46% CP), that contained the hulls. However, Evonik published regional data in the past under 3 categories; regular (40-46% CP), premium (46-49% CP) and hi-pro (>49% CP) to cover variation observed in SBM quality.


Quality and price of SBM has major effect on the feed quality and cost. More than 152,000 SBM samples were analyzed for AA, proximate parameters and AMEn using Evonik AMINONIR® services. Assessment of nutritive value only based on the CP content can be misleading and results in economic losses and reduction in poultry performance. Table 1 shows variation in AA profile of two SBM samples having same CP content (46.8%). This variation in AA profile has great impact on feed cost. The difference in feed cost of USD 4.10 per MT of starter broiler diet is due to difference in AA profile of above mentioned two SBM samples (Table 3). This effect of variation in AA profile at same CP content on feed cost is valid for other oilseed meals. Therefore, nutritional quality assessment of oilseed meals should be done on AA profile instead of CP content. Nutrient profile of SBM is changing with passage of time due to different varieties, growing conditions and processing technologies. Figure 2 shows broad variation in lysine and AMEn contents of analyzed SBM samples even at same CP content.

  


 

Figure 2:  Relationship between (a) CP and lysine and (b) CP and AMEn of soybean meal samples analyzed in Asia South (2017-19).

 

Table 1:  Variation in the amino acid profile (%) of two soybean meal (SBM) samples with same crude protein (CP) content
 

 

Table 2:  Ingredient and nutrient composition of broiler starter corn-soy diets formulated with use of two soybean meal (SBM) samples with same crude protein content and different amino acid profile
 

 

It is not only an excellent source of essential AA but also energy and fatty acids. During heat treatment, the trypsin inhibitor activity should be destroyed otherwise it reduces the digestibility of AA and poultry performance is compromised. The presence of anti-nutritional factors (trypsin inhibitors, lectins, antigenic proteins, and saponins) limits its use in poultry diets (Monari, 1996; Stein et al., 2008). Extrusion technology is considered as effective approach to inactivate the anti-nutritional substances in SFF (Bjorck, 1983). Overheating might also reduce the usable energy content (Willis, 2003).


There was broad variation in the AA profile and energy content of analyzed SFF samples. Figure 3 shows variation in lysine and AMEn contents of analyzed samples from 2017-19. Assessment based on AA profile and AMEn content provides opportunity to nutritionists and/or formulators for optimal use of SFF in poultry diets.

 


Figure 3:  Relationship between (a) CP and lysine and (b) CP and AMEn of soybean full fat samples analyzed in Asia South (2017-19).

 

Rapeseed meal


It is also an important AA/ protein source used in the diet of monogastric animals. Global production of RSM was 39.46 million ton in 2018-2019 (USDA, 2020). RSM is partially used as an alternate protein source for SBM in the livestock diets. The use of RSM in poultry feeds is limited because of low protein and essential AA contents, low digestibility coefficients and the presence of anti-nutritional factors such as glucosinolates and erucic acid compared to SBM (Newkirk, 2009). New varieties of rapeseed from North America, Europe and Australia contain less anti-nutritional factors. Canola is the improved variety of rapeseed. RSM can be included in broiler and layer diets up to 10-15% and 7-8%, respectively (Nega and Woldes, 2018).


Figure 4 shows variation in lysine and AMEn contents of RSM samples analyzed from 2017-19. Two clusters for lysine and AMEn contents of analyzed RSM samples are due to different origins. Samples from USA origin have high lysine and AMEn contents compared to samples from Indian subcontinent. Large variation in lysine and AMEn contents even at same CP confirms that quality assessment of RSM based on CP content is misleading.
 


Figure 4:  Relationship between (a) CP and lysine and (b) CP and AMEn of rapeseed meal samples analyzed in Asia South (2017-19).

 

Conclusions


    •  NIR is a fast and reliable tool to assess the nutritional quality of oilseed meals and other raw materials.
 
    •  There is large variation in the nutrient profile of oilseed meals. Assessment of accurate quality of oilseed
        meals based on analyzed values of AA, proximate parameters and energy helps in economical
        purchasing decisions, meeting nutrient requirements to optimize poultry performance and reducing safety
        margins in poultry feed.
 
    •  High levels of essential AA and AMEn of reported oilseed meals highlight their importance in poultry feed
        industry. Regular testing of nutrient profile of oilseed meals is important and economical approach for
        their optimal use in poultry feed.
 
    •  Nutritive value of oilseed meals should be assessed based on essential AA profile rather than CP content.
        High CP content does not always mean high essential AA profile.
 
 

For more of the article, please click here.

 

Article made possible through the contribution of M. Ali, P. Ramesh, S. Ramos, P. Krishnan and Evonik (SEA) Pte Ltd, Singapore